Legally Speaking with Michael Mulligan

A small BC registry faced an outsized problem: one litigant’s avalanche of quasi‑legal letters and “certificates” that looked official enough to demand hours or days of staff time to sort, scan, and check. We trace how the Attorney General sought an injunction and how the court landed on a careful middle ground—no more bulk mail, but full access for legitimate filings in person, by agent, or through Court Services Online, with authority to discard items that don’t meet the Rules of Court. It’s a practical fix aimed at protecting open courts from being gamed by invented pa...

Courtrooms, campus corridors, mountain slopes, and border tarmacs: we connect them through three rulings that change how you navigate rights, rules, and risk. We start with a Vancouver Island University protest case where banners, ladders, and megaphones escalated into disruptions of exams. The student fought a two‑year suspension, arguing misidentification, unfair process, and—most ambitiously—freedom of expression under the Charter. We walk through why the court said no, revisiting Dolphin Delivery and the baseline that the Charter restrains government, not institutions acting independently. In BC, universities aren’t automatically treated as government actors, so Charter arguments usually fail unl...

A 76-page justice overhaul just landed, and we’re diving into what actually changes for victims, accused persons, and the people who keep our courts running. We break down how Bill C-16 reframes parts of criminal law—naming femicide as a route to first-degree murder, tackling AI-generated intimate images and deepfakes, and defining coercive control—while asking the hard question: can an already stretched system carry the weight?

We walk through the new femicide framework and why proving patterns of coercive or controlling behaviour will demand careful evidence and clear jury instructions. Then we turn to the digita...

A single sentence can change a career. We open with a real-world case: a shuttle driver on SFU property tells a flagger she’s “unbelievably beautiful” and suggests modelling. Security documents the exchange, the university issues a campus ban, and the employer fires him. He then pushes for the complainant’s identity under FOIPPA, arguing that the decision-makers needed complete, accurate information. We walk through why FOIPPA binds public bodies but not private companies, how section 28 actually works, and why the court said disclosure wasn’t required when the driver admitted the key facts. Plus, we flag the sting in the tai...

A signed page beside a will. A daughter who gave up her life to care for her parents. A court is asked to decide whether a single sheet of paper can rewrite an estate. We dig into a recent BC Supreme Court ruling to unpack how WESA’s formal requirements and the curative power of section 58 actually work when intention, capacity, language, and timing collide. If you’ve ever wondered whether “wishes” are enough, this story shows why two witnesses, translation, and dated execution details matter more than heartfelt words.

Then we pivot from probate to plumbing with a s...

A single sentence in the Criminal Code can decide whether you can legally remove someone from your home—or whether you’re suddenly the one at risk of an assault charge. We break down a fresh BC Supreme Court ruling that reads purpose into Parliament’s 2011 reforms on self-defence and defence of property, answering a practical question with big stakes: if you invite someone in and later revoke consent, can you use reasonable force to make them leave? Short answer: yes, if you give a reasonable time to go and the force is proportionate, because the law was never meant...

Ever wondered when a judge’s questions stop clarifying and start tilting the scales? We dive into a BC sexual assault case where the trial judge’s heavy-handed interventions—pages of pointed questioning, steering how evidence was led, and relying on answers personally elicited—pushed the process past what a reasonable observer would call fair. The conviction didn’t fall because of proven bias, but because the appearance of fairness matters just as much as the verdict, and the court ordered a new trial to reset the game.

From that courtroom moment, we zoom out to a piece of C...

A 20-year online feud that began on a community website ended with a meticulously planned attack inside a BC courtroom—red clothes to hide blood, a packed suitcase, a knife and a hammer, and alcohol for courage. We walk through how the trial judge weighed mental health evidence against extensive planning, why the NCRMD standard remains a high bar, and how appellate courts defer to sentencing judges unless there’s a clear error. You’ll hear exactly why a 12-year sentence held firm despite arguments for reduced moral culpability.

Then we pivot to a case that could change...

Think “bail reform” will clean up street disorder? We take a hard look at what Bill C‑14 really changes and why it targets the wrong problem. From the presumption of innocence to the right to remain silent, we trace how symbolic tweaks and reverse onus proposals collide with Charter protections while doing little to speed justice or improve safety. If the true bottleneck is time to trial, then the fixes live in courtrooms, staffing, treatment, and housing—not in performative reminders to judges about conditions they already use.

We map the actual bail framework: primary grounds to ensure a...

A guilty plea, a forgotten past, and a courtroom test of how identity meets justice. We open with a 2011 assault case resolved by a joint submission: an 18‑month conditional sentence after the accused conceded his force exceeded self‑defence. Years later, he discovered his father was Indigenous and obtained status, then sought an out‑of‑time appeal to revisit both plea and sentence. We walk through the legal gatekeeping for late appeals—intention, prejudice, merit, and the interests of justice—and unpack why section 718.2(e) and the Supreme Court’s Gladue jurisprudence require more than ancestry alone. Without a Gladue report...

A notorious criminal case and a sweeping policy change collide in one packed hour, and the throughline is unmistakable: how law balances dignity, proof, and practical consequences. We start by unpacking the latest development in the Robert Picton matter: with the RCMP ending their investigation and holding thousands of seized items—some believed to be human remains—families sought a court order to keep everything preserved for a civil occupiers’ liability claim against Picton’s estate and his brother. We walk you through why the judge refused. The key: meticulous police documentation, DNA profiles, and forensic records made the physical...

A seven‑month marriage sparked on a sugar‑arrangement site, a $12,000/month support bid, and a dog named Frankie—this one has layers. We open with a candid walk‑through of interim spousal support: what it’s for, how courts weigh “capacity to pay,” and why selling capital assets to fund an opulent lifestyle isn’t the same as earning income. The applicant’s luxury‑level budget meets judicial scrutiny, while the respondent’s push to impute escort income and point to family wealth hits legal limits. The end result—$4,000/month plus a retroactive lump—shows how judges balance short marriages, realistic...

Where do your constitutional protections begin and end? The dividing line between private actions and state authority forms the heart of a fascinating BC Court of Appeal decision that clarifies when ordinary citizens become "agents of the police."

The case centers on Loomis Courier employees who, at police direction, set aside suspicious packages for warrantless seizure during a drug investigation. Unlike previous cases involving independent security guards or school administrators, these employees were acting on specific police instructions. The Court established that the key test is whether individuals would have conducted themselves the same way "but for"...

What happens when the line between victim and perpetrator blurs in the eyes of the law? When a homeowner confronts a crossbow-wielding intruder or store employees stop a car theft, should they face criminal charges or civil lawsuits for defending themselves and their property?

Barrister Michael Mulligan unpacks the controversial legal landscape of self-defense in Canada, explaining how the 2012 amendments to the Criminal Code created a complex "reasonableness" requirement for those protecting themselves or others. This means that even when facing deadly threats in your own home, the law expects you to consider factors like the relative...

What happens when a legal system designed for small claims is used to tackle complex issues involving international companies and constitutional requirements? Barrister and Solicitor Michael Mulligan takes us inside a fascinating recent case that exposes serious flaws in British Columbia's Civil Resolution Tribunal system.

Originally created to efficiently handle disputes under $5,000 and minor strata disagreements, the CRT has been expanded into areas far beyond its capabilities. The recent decision involving Twitter/X reveals a troubling reality: secret decisions and unenforceable orders against international companies, with no authority to address constitutional challenges, and vulnerability to exploitation through...

Fentanyl trafficking sentences in BC just got a major overhaul. The BC Court of Appeal has mapped out clearer sentencing guidelines, creating a three-tier system that reflects the devastating impact of the deadly opioid crisis. Street-level dealers now face 18 months to 3 years, mid-level traffickers 4-7 years, and wholesale distributors 8-15 years behind bars. The Court emphasized this framework still allows judges to tailor sentences to individual circumstances, but makes clear that the gravity of fentanyl trafficking demands serious consequences. With over 14,500 British Columbians having lost their lives to toxic drugs in just eight years, the justice system is responding...

When does a driving mistake become a crime? The latest Court of Appeal ruling tackles this haunting question through the case of a driver who missed a red light, causing a collision that killed an 18-month-old child and seriously injured the father. Despite the devastating outcome, the court upheld the driver's acquittal on dangerous driving charges, drawing a careful distinction between tragedy and criminality.

The case illuminates the legal threshold for dangerous driving in Canada. Unlike provincial traffic violations, criminal dangerous driving requires a "marked departure from the standard of care of a reasonably prudent driver." This...

The foundation of property ownership in British Columbia faces a potential earthquake with the landmark Cowichan Tribes decision. After what may be Canada's longest trial—spanning over 500 days—the judge delivered an 800-page ruling that could fundamentally alter who truly owns land throughout the province.

Michael Mulligan breaks down this complex legal battle by explaining the collision between two powerful forces: BC's Torrens property system and Aboriginal title claims under Section 35 of the Constitution. The Torrens system provides what legal experts call "indefeasible title"—conclusive proof of ownership registered with the government that enables secure property transactions and mo...

A fascinating exploration of justice, liberty, and the limits of government power unfolds through three recent BC legal cases. When a minimum-security prisoner at William Head was caught embracing a senior correctional officer, the warden's decision to transfer him to a higher-security facility backfired spectacularly. The BC Supreme Court ruled the decision "unreasonable," highlighting how even prisoners retain certain liberties that can't be arbitrarily removed. The judge particularly noted the warden's failure to address the significant power imbalance between the inmate and staff member – a consideration that might have led to very different outcomes had gender roles been reversed. Duration: 00:20:59

Frustrated by an airline refusing compensation for your delayed flight? You might have more power than you think. Legal expert Michael Mulligan walks us through a fascinating Civil Resolution Tribunal case where passengers successfully challenged WestJet's weather-related excuses and secured $1,000 each in compensation. By gathering evidence showing other airlines operating during the supposedly problematic conditions, these passengers demonstrated how everyday Canadians can effectively navigate the Air Passenger Protection Regulations through BC's accessible online tribunal system.

The conversation shifts to judicial impartiality with a cautionary West Vancouver demolition dispute. When a judge ordered a fire-damaged house demolished, no...

What happens when legal formulas, charge approval standards, and competing legitimate needs collide with real human lives? Today's deep dive examines three significant cases that reveal the profound human impact of our justice systems.

The Hockey Canada sexual assault trial verdict brings crucial lessons about the presumption of innocence and the value of detailed judicial reasoning. Unlike jury trials that provide no explanation, this judge-alone trial delivered a comprehensive analysis of why all the accused were acquitted. The judge methodically explained finding the complainant neither credible nor reliable, citing multiple conflicting statements and video evidence contradicting later...

The boundaries of judicial authority in Canada have been redrawn by a groundbreaking Supreme Court ruling that empowers judges to conduct murder trials without juries—even when prosecutors object. This remarkable case emerged from the early pandemic when COVID-19 made traditional jury trials nearly impossible. A defendant, unwilling to face further delay, requested a judge-alone trial, but prosecutors refused consent. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with the trial judge who proceeded anyway, establishing that protecting a defendant's right to timely justice can override prosecutorial preferences.

This ruling fundamentally reshapes our understanding of what falls within a prosecutor's un...

Ever wondered what happens when one party drops 4 million documents on their opponent in a lawsuit? Michael Mulligan explains the fascinating legal concept of an "impermissible document dump" through the lens of a billion-dollar dispute over the North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant. The case reveals how modern litigation handles vast electronic records and when providing mountains of documents crosses from thorough disclosure to litigation obstruction.

The contrast couldn't be greater when we shift to a dispute over sofa cushions that need "fluffing." When purchasers discovered their $4,400 sofa required constant maintenance despite requesting one that was "solid and...

What happens when a sophisticated scammer steals over half a million dollars in Bitcoin through a phone company's security failure? And more importantly, can you even take them to court?

The answer is more complicated than you might think, as we explore in this eye-opening legal examination of consumer rights in the digital age. A British Columbia resident fell victim to an elaborate fraud when someone impersonated a Rogers technician, convinced a retail employee to enable screen sharing, and accessed the Rogers customer database. After extracting personal information, the scammer performed a SIM swap and drained the...

What happens when a child's life depends on a medication that costs nearly a million dollars per year? In this eye-opening conversation with Michael Mulligan of Mulligan Defence Lawyers, we take a deep dive into the tragic case of nine-year-old Charleigh Pollock from Langford, who suffers from the rare genetic disorder Batten disease.

Mulligan walks us through the complex web of legislation governing medication coverage in British Columbia, revealing the stark truth about how these life-or-death decisions are made. Despite common misconceptions about universal healthcare, the reality is that medication funding falls under provincial jurisdiction through the...

The legal landscape in Canada continues to evolve with significant implications for sexual assault cases, courtroom procedures, and sentencing guidelines.

A groundbreaking Supreme Court of Canada decision has overturned a British Columbia sexual assault conviction in a case where prosecutors introduced evidence about the complainant's sexual inexperience without proper screening. The Court established that "sexual inactivity evidence" – including statements about virginity or lack of sexual interest – must face the same strict admissibility standards as evidence about past sexual activity. This landmark ruling recognizes that just as past consent doesn't imply present consent, past abstinence doesn't imply present non...

What happens when crucial evidence is withheld from the defence in a murder case? The devastating consequences unfolded in a tragic BC case where a woman's life was completely shattered after being wrongfully convicted in connection with a toddler's drowning death.

The Supreme Court of Canada recently ordered an acquittal for a woman who served a year in prison after pleading guilty to criminal negligence causing death. She made this plea without knowing that Crown prosecutors had withheld 140 pages of material questioning the reliability of the medical examiner whose opinions were central to the case against her...

Navigating the legal maze of property transactions and civil judgments requires understanding nuances that aren't always obvious. Michael Mulligan, barrister and solicitor with Mulligan Defence Lawyers, unpacks two fascinating cases that illuminate these complexities.

First, Mulligan explores a cautionary tale about what constitutes a "fixture" in home purchases. When buyers discovered a beloved dresser missing after taking possession—revealing holes in the wall behind it—they sued for $7,430 in damages. The case hinged on whether the dresser qualified as a fixture that should remain with the property. The legal test? If an item is attached to the prop...

Ever wondered if your dog could land you in legal hot water? Or what happens when your neighbour's business becomes an unbearable nuisance? Legal expert Michael Mulligan returns to Legally Speaking with three captivating cases that reveal the fascinating intersection of everyday life and Canadian law.

The spotlight first falls on Juliet, a miniature Australian shepherd whose elevator encounter led to a $4,800 claim after she allegedly bit a woman's hand. Mulligan unpacks the surprising legal doctrine that essentially gives dogs "one free bite" before owners face liability. The Civil Resolution Tribunal's dismissal of the case highlights the...

The BC Court of Appeal has delivered a significant ruling that serves as a stark warning to property sellers: crossing out questions on disclosure forms doesn't eliminate your responsibility to be truthful. When a seller drew lines through all disclosure questions, writing only that the property was tenant-occupied and he'd never lived there, he created a legal nightmare for himself. After discovering an unpermitted addition, the buyer backed out – but the seller kept the $300,000 deposit and sued for more. Though initially successful, the Court of Appeal reversed the decision, finding the seller knew about the problem and his line-crossing te...

What does it take to sentence a dog to death? Far less than you might think. In our latest deep dive into fascinating legal territory, we explore a heartbreaking case from Kamloops where a pit bull named Ferb faced the ultimate penalty under BC's dangerous dog laws. 

The story weaves through a tragic background - Ferb, stabbed five times as a puppy before being rescued, later found himself implicated in the killing of a neighbour's collie. What makes this case particularly compelling is how it illuminates the stark difference between animal and human justice systems. While humans r...

The complex legal landscape of vicarious liability takes center stage in this illuminating discussion with Lawyer Michael Mulligan. At the heart of our conversation is a heartbreaking Victoria case where a retired teacher-turned-tutor sexually abused a grade six student, resulting in a $2.3 million judgment. We dissect the Court of Appeal's reasoning on why, despite creating the initial relationship, the school board wasn't held vicariously liable for the teacher's actions that occurred after retirement and away from school grounds.

The legal principle at stake here affects countless institutions across Canada. While the abuse would never have occurred without...

Navigating mental health crises poses profound challenges for families watching loved ones deteriorate without effective intervention options. This episode sheds light on a powerful yet underutilized legal tool - Section 28 of BC's Mental Health Act, which allows family members and concerned individuals to apply directly for a "warrant of apprehension" when someone exhibits dangerous mental health symptoms.

A recent Colwood court judgment outlines exactly how this process works, revealing that applications have increased significantly recently. The warrant enables initial 48-hour detention for proper assessment when someone displays behaviour indicating they may harm themselves or others. We dissect...

Privacy rights take center stage as the BC Court of Appeal delivers a powerful message to organizations handling sensitive information. When an ICBC employee sold policyholder data to criminal organizations, resulting in targeted arson and shooting attacks against numerous victims, the insurance giant fought tooth and nail to minimize compensation. The Court ultimately upheld a $15,000 award for each affected individual, establishing a crucial precedent that privacy violations cause significant harm even without visible damage.

The ruling recognizes that having your personal details sold to criminals creates genuine suffering, even when physical attacks don't materialize. This landmark decision...

The boundaries between student life and financial freedom come under scrutiny in this fascinating examination of a groundbreaking Supreme Court of Canada decision. When does your status as a "student" truly end? According to Canada's highest court, returning to school—even part-time and self-funded—resets the seven-year countdown clock that protects government student loans from bankruptcy proceedings.

Through a split 6-3 decision, the court delves into the subtle nuances of legal language, including how the French version of Canadian law influenced their interpretation. The case presents a sobering reality for those hoping to discharge student debt through bank...

What happens when someone experiencing a psychotic episode intentionally crashes into a motorcyclist they believe is a "demon"? This fascinating exploration of mental illness and legal liability takes us through a landmark BC case that transforms how we understand responsibility when reality breaks down.

The distinction between criminal and civil liability becomes crucial as we follow the story of a man with no prior psychiatric history who suffered a complete psychotic break in 2018. While criminal law might find him not responsible due to mental disorder, civil law focuses on compensation rather than punishment. The judge's nuanced approach...

The complex interplay between law, morality, and human tragedy takes center stage in our latest episode examining three compelling legal cases that highlight how our justice system navigates competing interests.

We begin by exploring the "rescuer doctrine" - a legal principle establishing that if someone's negligence creates a dangerous situation, they can be liable for injuries sustained by those who attempt to help. This emerged in a heartrending case involving a woman who rushed to save a person whose wheelchair became stuck on railway tracks as a train approached. Despite her heroic efforts, she couldn't free the...

Premier David Eby's partial retreat on the Economic Stabilization Tariff Response Act marks a significant moment in BC's response to US tariff threats. While the government has agreed to remove Part 4 of Bill 7—the section granting powers to amend legislation without parliamentary approval—legal expert Michael Mulligan reveals why serious concerns remain.

The bill still contains provisions allowing the government to unilaterally cancel contracts, change procurement practices, and impose taxes without legislative debate. Particularly troubling is language that prevents affected parties from seeking judicial review of government actions—a fundamental protection in democratic systems. "Protection against legal procee...

The latest Legally Speaking segment with Michael Mulligan takes listeners on a fascinating journey through British Columbia's alternative dispute resolution landscape, revealing both promising innovations and concerning pitfalls in our justice system.

The conversation begins with an extraordinary Civil Resolution Tribunal case in which a woman abandoned $95,000 of her $100,000 claim to proceed in a forum designed for minor disputes—only to lose everything. This cautionary tale illustrates the critical importance of forum selection and the permanent consequences of claim abandonment. Mulligan explains how the tribunal determined responsibility in a sophisticated WhatsApp fraud case, applying the principle of "wh...

Democracy stands at a crossroads in British Columbia as Michael Mulligan delivers a powerful analysis of the NDP's proposed Tariff Response Act (Bill C-7). Drawing on historical parallels that send shivers down the spine, Mulligan unpacks how this legislation bears troubling similarities to Nazi Germany's 1933 Enabling Act—legislation that effectively rendered their legislature irrelevant and set the stage for catastrophe.

The bill's provisions would allow the government to make retroactive amendments to laws, shield officials from judicial review for procurement decisions, and potentially criminalize non-compliance with up to two years imprisonment. Most alarming is how the exclusion of...

A Canadian adult entertainment company faces an $850,000 fine after Health Canada's undercover operation exposed a lucrative scheme selling "natural health products" that secretly contained prescription medication. Michael Mulligan walks us through how MFH International Enterprises marketed pills called "Harmony" and "Passion Femme" as herbal alternatives while charging premium prices of nearly $140 for just 10 tablets. Health Canada's testing revealed these products contained triple doses of erectile dysfunction medications - putting unwitting consumers at serious risk, especially those with heart conditions.

The case raises alarming questions about consumer safety in the natural health product market. As Mulligan points out, "...

The spectre of trade wars looms as social media announced tariffs threaten to disrupt the Canada-US relationship, but a powerful alternative to the traditional tit-for-tat approach exists. Rather than punishing ourselves with counter-tariffs that make goods more expensive for Canadians, we could follow Brazil's remarkably successful strategy from 2010.

When faced with harmful US cotton subsidies, Brazil obtained WTO approval to suspend American intellectual property protections on pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and entertainment. The threat alone was so effective that the US  capitulated, passing corrective legislation and paying compensation. This approach targeted America's post-industrial economy, where true value lies not i...

Explore the intricate landscape of Canadian immigration law with us in this episode, where we unravel the surprising realities that can lead to deportation for long-term residents. Our primary focus is a captivating case involving a UK citizen who, after living in Canada for over 70 years, finds himself facing deportation due to organized criminality. The conversation sheds light on the legal definitions that can suddenly place an individual at risk, even for what may seem minor infractions. 

 Additionally, a heart-wrenching tale on an exploding stove illustrates the challenges individuals face within civil legal systems, highlighting the importance an...

What legal responsibilities do towns have when a simple stroll through a park turns tragic? Join us as we sit down with Michael Mulligan to uncover the layers of liability and negligence that come into play when public spaces fail to safeguard their visitors. Through the lens of a heart-wrenching case involving a young boy in Gibsons who became tetraplegic after a dead tree fell on him, we explore the critical question of whether the town fulfilled its duty of care under the Occupiers Liability Act. Michael helps us dissect the legal obligations and expectations placed on municipalities to...

Unlock the secrets to challenging traffic citations and safeguarding your inheritance as we dissect intriguing legal scenarios from British Columbia. Ever wondered about the complexities behind those speed signs in construction zones? Discover how questioning their validity can shift the burden onto the Crown and how this impacts unsuspecting drivers. We'll shine a light on the legal presumptions that surround highway signage and discuss a recent case that brings these issues to the forefront, revealing the puzzling maze drivers might face when confronted with misleading or improperly erected signs.

On a different note, we venture into the...

Prepare to challenge your understanding of Canadian law with our guest, Michael Mulligan, as we unravel three pivotal legal cases making headlines in British Columbia. First, we dissect a bold ruling where a BC judge declared the 25-year parole ineligibility for first-degree murder unconstitutional. This decision could transform the legal landscape, questioning whether longstanding standards align with modern constitutional rights. We explore the historical precedents, including the Supreme Court of Canada's 1990 Luxton decision, and consider the implications of evolving legal interpretations on future cases.

Switching gears, we uncover the curious dismissal of a case due to a...

What if one impulsive moment could change a murder charge to manslaughter? Understanding the intricate nuances of Canadian law, we unpack the legal concept of provocation, especially its role in the justice system. Explore the far-reaching implications of the 2015 amendments under the Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act and the constitutional debates they spark. Discover a recent BC Court of Appeal case where a husband, embroiled in a complex narrative of alleged long-term abuse, challenges the application of these laws amidst claims of provocation.

Tackle the vital theme of reputation and justice through a defamation case...

Imagine being penalized for a simple screen touch while trying to make a living. Michael Mulligan of Mulligan Defence Lawyers joins us to unravel the outdated distracted driving laws that put gig economy drivers in a bind. Our conversation sheds light on how these regulations, which only permit screen interactions for phone calls, fail to consider today's work environment for gig workers like Uber Eats drivers. We highlight a noteworthy case where a driver was convicted for accepting a delivery, underscoring the urgent need for legislative reform. You'll also hear about some amusing quirks in the law, like the...

Unlock the hidden power of intellectual property in global trade as we explore Canada's strategic maneuvers against US policies. Instead of traditional tariffs, imagine the impact of restricting US intellectual property rights on Canadian soil. Get ready to dissect a thrilling legal case over a $2 million lottery ticket—is it a solo jackpot or a group windfall? We unravel the details, from the tangled web of evidence to the burden of proof that could make or break the case.

But the intrigue doesn't stop there. Brace yourself for the shocking story of a woman masquerading as a nu...

The episode dives into the intriguing dynamics between the United States and Canada, particularly surrounding trade and intellectual property (IP). As US President Donald Trump threatened tariffs on Canadian goods, a discussion emerged on how Canada could respond strategically. The central theme revolves around the underappreciated power of intellectual property as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations, particularly for a smaller nation like Canada. Michael Mulligan, a Barrister with Mulligan Defence Lawyers, emphasized that tariffs, often seen as the primary retaliatory measure, could ultimately harm Canadian consumers more than US producers.

Understanding the intricate mechanisms of tariffs...

Can a province truly bypass judicial processes in the name of housing development? Join us as we tackle this question with Michael Mulligan of Mulligan Defence Lawyers, providing his expert insights into a legal storm brewing over a proposed 12-story housing project in Vancouver's Kitsilano neighbourhood. This episode uncovers constitutional tensions as the provincial government attempts to circumvent judicial review, sparking a broader discussion about the limits of provincial power and the essential role of superior courts as outlined in section 96 of the Constitution Act 1867. Listen closely as we dissect the court's stance on rezoning requirements and the implications...

Our conversation begins with a deep dive into the charge approval process for sexual assault, where we illuminate the nuances between the standards required for police arrests and those for Crown charge approvals. We tackle the challenge of relying solely on the versions of events provided by complaints due to the lack of independent witnesses or forensic evidence. Through a discussion on trauma-informed interviewing, we ponder its potential impact on case outcomes and highlight the importance of maintaining fairness by not labelling complainants as victims before trial proceedings.

In the second half of the show, we tackle...

Why did former Constable Ferris' questionable actions lead to a legal overturning of drug convictions, and what role did an inadequate defence play in this dramatic courtroom saga? Join us as we promise to unravel the complexities of police misconduct, discredited testimonies, and the impact of mental health on legal defence. With Michael Mulligan of Mulligan Defence Lawyers as our guide, we navigate through a case that underscores how fragile justice can be, hinging on the integrity of evidence and the robustness of representation. This is more than just a legal story—it's a reflection on trust in law en...

Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers joins us to untangle the intricate web of legal challenges sparked by personal entanglements within the courtroom. Imagine a scenario where a defence counsel's paralegal is romantically involved with the Crown counsel during a sexual assault trial. This isn't a plot twist from a legal drama, but a real-life case from Courtenay that led to a mistrial application, questioning the boundaries of professional ethics and the accused's right to know. We navigate through the complexities of this case, drawing parallels with precedents from Canada and the UK, and ponder the judge's authority to...

Unravel the complexities of the criminal justice system as we confront two captivating legal stories in this episode. We begin with the unsettling case of a man whose violent spree of stranger attacks led to a legal battle over his sentence. Despite a traumatic past and serious substance issues, the BC Court of Appeal upheld his seven-year sentence, prompting us to question the balance between justice and rehabilitation. Explore the legal principles of consecutive versus concurrent sentences and the totality principle while grappling with societal challenges around providing treatment and shelter to those who resist it.

The...

Experience an insightful journey through the complexities of the electoral process and the justice system with Michael Mulligan, Barrister and Solicitor at Mulligan Defence Lawyers. Ever wondered how a mere 27-vote difference can trigger a full judicial recount? This episode unravels the meticulous choreography behind recounts in the Surrey-Guilford Electoral District. Michael sheds light on how transparency and voter privacy are harmonized, the role of media in maintaining public confidence, and the captivating stories of disputed ballots where every mark counts.

Switching gears, join us as we navigate through a high-stakes case in the Court of Appeal...

Discover the serious legal ramifications of fleeing from justice in our latest episode, where we promise to unravel the complexities of absconding from trial and inter-jurisdictional disputes. Join us as we dissect a compelling case from Canada involving a woman who, after facing charges of forging a passport application, fled to India mid-trial, leading to her conviction in absentia. Her attempts to appeal while abroad were denied. We also navigate the nuanced world of easements in British Columbia, focusing on a heated legal dispute over a navigation light easement impacting blackberry field owners. The principle of inter-jurisdictional immunity takes...

Get ready to uncover the intricacies of the legal system with Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers as we dissect a fascinating case of breach of trust theft. Ever wondered why embezzling from an employer gets a harsher sentence than other types of theft? This episode promises to enlighten you on the significant emphasis courts place on general deterrence, especially when trust is violated. We break down the sentencing, guilty pleas, and the crucial distinction between serving time in a penitentiary versus house arrest.

But that's not all! We also tackle the essential tools for debt collection—ga...

What happens when a wealthy business owner disappears without a trace, leaving behind a tangled web of allegations, destroyed property, and unanswered questions? Join us as we explore this real-life mystery with expert insights from barrister and solicitor Michael Mulligan of Mulligan Defence Lawyers. We journey through the intricacies of the Presumption of Death Act, examining a case where millions in life insurance hinge on the final determination of a man's fate. From the eerie aftermath of a fire in his airplane hangar to the bizarre silence of his bank accounts, the case presents a fascinating puzzle full of...

Ever wondered how a judicial recount can flip an election result on its head? Join us as Michael Mulligan, a seasoned barrister and solicitor with Mulligan Defence Lawyers, unravels the complexities of vote counting and recounts in Canadian elections. You'll gain unique insights into the procedures that follow the so-called "final count" and the very narrow margins that necessitate a mandatory recount. With captivating examples from the 2020 BC election and earlier federal contests, Michael illustrates how recounts can alter initial leads dramatically, revealing the fragility and volatility of election outcomes.

As if elections weren't complex enough, we...

Unlock the secrets of British Columbia's electoral process as we journey through the intricacies of the Election Act with the knowledgeable Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers. We'll explore how the act paves the way for an inclusive voting experience, spotlighting innovative measures like tele-assisted voting for individuals with disabilities and accommodations for voters with mobility challenges. The episode reveals how the integrity of our elections is upheld through systems that allow for challenging voter eligibility, ensuring that every voice is heard without compromise.

Take a step back in history with us as we examine the unique...

Can you really shoot a dog to save your chickens? We unravel this legal conundrum with the expert insights of Michael Mulligan, a seasoned barrister and solicitor from Mulligan Defence Lawyers. Mulligan helps us dissect the latest criminal justice reform proposals from the BC election campaign, including the prospect of hiring more sheriffs and judges to alleviate court backlogs. Together, we weigh the importance of a comprehensive strategy that also considers the roles of Crown counsel, court clerks, and legal aid. Plus, we look at the intriguing suggestion of a statutory court for minor offenses and the potential impact...

What happens when a seemingly straightforward hunting trip turns into a legal conundrum over age determination and strict liability offences? Join us as we unpack the captivating case of the Massey Ram. Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers sheds light on how hunters can find themselves in hot water under the Wildlife Act, and why counting horn annuli is not as straightforward as it seems. We unravel the complexities of distinguishing between criminal and strict liability offences and explore the intriguing defence of due diligence using relatable examples like speeding.

Ever wondered about the ripple effects of...

Can we really ensure the safety and dignity of elderly care facility residents when young adults with severe mental health and addiction issues are placed among them? This episode exposes the unsettling reality in Victoria and Nanaimo, where vulnerable elderly individuals share long-term care homes with younger adults facing significant challenges. We break down the legal ramifications, analyze the Resident's Bill of Rights, and reveal shocking staff reports of drug use, violence, and inadequate staffing. The lack of enforcement mechanisms leaves elderly residents defenceless, sparking a crucial conversation about the need for alternative facilities.

Shifting gears, we...

Are machetes the next weapon to be banned in Canada? Join us as we dissect the provincial NDP Attorney General's request to the federal government following a tragic attack in Vancouver. We'll scrutinize the effectiveness of recent bail reforms and explore the peculiarities of Canada's current weapon prohibitions, including some surprising bans on items like nunchucks and certain missile launchers. Additionally, we delve into the federal government's controversial firearm buyback program, questioning the logic and execution behind these sweeping legislative measures.

In our second segment, we turn our attention to the mandatory Indigenous training course for the...

Curious about the legalities that surround everyday mishaps? Join us as we explore these fascinating topics with Michael Mulligan, a seasoned Barrister and Solicitor from Mulligan Defence Lawyers. We kick off by dissecting a real-life incident where a woman sustained serious injuries after tripping in a pothole at a 7-Eleven parking lot. Michael offers a deep dive into the Occupiers Liability Act in British Columbia, emphasizing the critical need for a reasonable system of inspections and maintenance to counter negligence claims. We'll also touch on the nuances of exceptions, such as for trespassers and specific rural or recreational properties.<...

Discover the hidden cracks in British Columbia's mental health system as we dissect a recent tragic case in Vancouver that underscores systemic failures. Despite the Mental Health Act's provisions, inadequate resources and treatment facilities have left many vulnerable individuals untreated and homeless. We'll explore the urgent need for proactive measures and discuss how addressing mental health issues is paramount for both public safety and humane treatment.

Is the bail system in BC failing those in crisis? We scrutinize the strain on emergency departments and police resources, especially regarding mental health emergencies. Our conversation goes beyond the limitations...

Can changing bail laws solve the epidemic of drug addiction and mental illness plaguing British Columbia? Join us as Michael Mulligan challenges the status quo, making the case that the province's focus on bail reform is a misstep. Instead, Mulligan argues for a more holistic approach that prioritizes comprehensive treatment resources to tackle the roots of criminal behavior. Through a critical analysis of current policies, we uncover why simply altering the bail system won't lead to a significant reduction in crime or social disorder.

In our exploration, we examine a heartbreaking case from Surrey, shedding light on...

Ever wondered how a simple oversight can cost thousands in the legal world? Join us in this episode of Legally Speaking as we examine a pivotal case in the Canadian criminal justice system where the Crown's failure to hand over essential police notes in an impaired driving case led to a hefty financial penalty. We delve into the consequences of this negligence, including a rare ruling for costs on appeal, highlighting the critical importance of complete and timely disclosure in ensuring justice. You'll also get an insider's perspective on the high stakes involved and the potential financial fallout when...

Ever wondered how far the boundaries of solicitor-client privilege extend? Join us in a riveting conversation with Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers as we explore the critical nuances of wiretaps and lawyer-client communications. Starting with a fascinating case from Saskatchewan, we uncover the story of a lawyer acquitted of obstruction of justice for allegedly tipping off a client about a search warrant. This episode promises an in-depth understanding of the stringent requirements for intercepting private communications in Canada, especially those involving lawyers, and emphasizes the pivotal role of legal provisions designed to protect privileged conversations.

We'll...

What if the justice system could truly hold police accountable? Explore the intricate and troubling case from Prince George, starting with a tragic encounter between an Indigenous man and RCMP officers that led to his death. We'll unravel the story of a bystander's crucial video evidence, its controversial deletion, and the ensuing legal battles that spotlight the need for judicial transparency and independent investigations.

Two RCMP officers faced obstruction of justice charges. One officer's unconvincing testimony led to an acquittal, while a rookie officer's manifest dishonesty resulted in his conviction. Michael Mulligan of Mulligan Defence Lawyers joins...

How can courtroom chaos lead to a year-long prison sentence being overturned? Discover the riveting story of a man's disruptive behaviour during his trial that led to a contempt conviction. Find out why his relentless pseudo-legal arguments and interruptions didn't hold up as the Court of Appeal stepped in to reverse the decision. We break down the different forms of contempt of court, focusing on incidents that occur directly in the courtroom, and explore the fine line between maintaining order and upholding justice.

But that’s not all—we also delve into the harrowing case of a woma...

What happens when a tragic act of violence intersects with mental illness and substance abuse? Join us on Legally Speaking as we unpack the heart-wrenching case of a 25-year-old Indigenous man in Trail, BC, who fatally attacked a 78-year-old stranger. This episode challenges the simplistic narrative of violent acts as mere bail system failures. We scrutinize the court's decision to convict the man of manslaughter instead of murder, shedding light on the significant role his mental state and drug-induced delusions played. Through this lens, we explore the deeper societal and systemic issues that contribute to such incidents, advocating for...

What happens when the law collides with contentious family decisions and public safety? Join us as we sit down with Michael Mulligan, a barrister and solicitor from Mulligan Defence Lawyers, to dissect a variety of complex legal scenarios. From the stringent criteria required to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada to a severe sentence handed down in Ontario for driving while disqualified, we explore the heavy legal consequences that can arise from repeated offences. This episode sheds light on British Columbia's stringent driving prohibition laws, illustrating how infractions can lead to significant penalties.

Have you ever...

Can employers terminate employees without cause, and what are the legal nuances involved? Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers to unravel a recent Court of Appeal decision in British Columbia surrounding wrongful dismissal, notice, and an employment contract. We dissect the case of a senior employee from Harbour Air Seaplanes who was let go during the COVID-19 pandemic and examine how the interplay between federal legislation and common law could  influence compensation beyond the statutory minimums.

But that's not all. We also tackle the significant ramifications of a landmark Supreme Court of Canada ruling on language rights i...

What happens when the right to a fair and public trial clashes with the need to protect informer confidentiality? This episode of our podcast takes you through a riveting journey into the complex world of informer privilege and the right to a transparent judicial process. We scrutinize a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision involving a secret trial in Quebec, where the Quebec Court of Appeal overturned the conviction due to abuse of process. Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers joins us to dissect the intricate legal principles at play and ponder the broader implications for justice and transparency...

Can corporations truly safeguard your privacy, or are we all at risk? Join us as we tackle this pressing question with Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers. In one of the most startling cases in recent memory, we dissect how an employee at the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC) sold personal information, resulting in arson and shootings. You'll learn about the class-action lawsuit that followed and the judicial system's decision to award $15,000 per affected individual despite ICBC's efforts to minimize compensation. Plus, we dive into the unsettling case of a widow sued by the Royal Bank of Canada...

How does a jury decide the value of the emotional and physical toll from a medical misdiagnosis? Join us as we explore a poignant case where a woman was mistakenly diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent unnecessary surgery, leading to a $400,000 jury award. We'll unravel the stringent criteria needed to hold a doctor legally accountable and dissect the often-mysterious process by which juries calculate non-pecuniary damages such as pain and suffering. This segment promises to shed light on the profound impact these legal decisions have on both patients and the healthcare system.

Shifting our focus, we then...

Could the very pillars of legal independence be shaking in British Columbia? Michael Mulligan, Barrister and solicitor of Mulligan Defence Lawyers, joins us in dissecting the controversial Legal Professions Act. His perspective shines an unflinching light on how this act could threaten the impartiality crucial to our justice system and the public interest. Get ready for a stirring analysis of the government's rush to legislate, the alarm sounded by legal professionals, and the constitutional challenges now rising to the surface.

Switching gears, we take a closer look at a recent manslaughter case that has left the legal...

Discover the unexpected legal twist when a skid steer transforms from a farm machine into an alleged weapon! Michael Mulligan, our expert from Mulligan Defence Lawyers, is back to dissect a peculiar case from Vernon where a man faces assault charges for using his skid steer in a dispute with homeless trespassers. Learn what makes a skid steer a "weapon," and get a masterclass in the legalities of assault and dangerous driving. Plus, we'll navigate the nuances of a justice system where the Supreme Court's interpretation can turn the tide in such unconventional scenarios.

Then, we tackle...

Discover the true impact of British Columbia's drug policy changes and the possible re-criminalization of hard drugs in public spaces as we navigate the labyrinthine details of Section 56 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. With the guidance of Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers, our latest conversation illuminates the gaps between government announcements and the actual legal language, leaving us questioning the intent behind recent amendments. Mulligan also sheds light on the paradoxical enforcement of marijuana possession laws, exploring the nuances of federal versus provincial prosecution and the transportation of legally obtained drugs.

The most recent...

Prepare to be engrossed as Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers dissects the intricate case of Ms. Davidson, deputy leader of the federal Green Party, whose criminal contempt conviction has stirred debate. The fine line between staunch activism and legal adherence is put to the test in our discussion of her bail pending appeal. We'll explore whether Davidson's bold pre-sentencing declarations will hold true as we scrutinize the nuanced balance of upholding one's convictions vs the rule of law. This episode promises a riveting look at the intersection of law and politics, with implications that reach well beyond a...

Join the riveting conversation with Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers as we unravel the complexities of the presumption of innocence in a special episode that delves into the legal labyrinth following a man arrested for multiple carjacking incidents. Mulligan illuminates the difficult decision points for police post-arrest and lays bare the intricacies of bail assessment, particularly when the individual in question has no criminal history. As we dissect the safeguards of community safety versus an individual’s right to freedom, our exploration will leave listeners with a deeper understanding of the criminal justice system's inner workings and the ph...

Prepare to navigate the tumultuous waters of legal reform and societal justice with our  guest, Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers. Our latest episode peels back the layers of Bill 21, a contentious BCNDP legislation aimed at bringing the regulator of lawyers in British Columbia under political control. Feel the electric tension as we dissect the Law Society of BC's apprehensions, the BC Conservative Party's firm stance on repeal, and the international law implications flagged by Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada. We tackle the poignant question: How will political gamesmanship shape the future of legal regulation?

Venture further as w...

British Columbia's legal system faces a seismic shift with Bill 21, a move that could rock the bedrock principle of lawyer independence. As the government nudges its way into the Law Society's boardroom, we're left pondering: will the scales of justice tilt in favour of those in power? This episode pulls back the curtain on the potential repercussions of such unprecedented government involvement. Joined by Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defense Lawyers, we dissect the changes proposed to the Legal Profession Act, critique the government's objectives, and forecast the intricate dance between lawyers and lawmakers in the courtroom ballet.

...

Embark on a journey through Canada and New Zealand's legal intricacies with Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defense Lawyers as we dissect how these common law cousins approach justice, representation, and the battle against drugs. You'll be captivated by our discussion highlighting the disparities in Indigenous peoples' representation in the prison systems—a pressing issue both here and in the land of the long white cloud. And if you're intrigued by the varying tactics in the war on drugs, our analysis of how New Zealand's crystal meth problems contrast with Canada's fentanyl crisis will provide you with a new perspective on...

Discover the fate of legal independence in British Columbia as Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers lends his expertise to the latest legal system 'modernization' attempts. This week's episode pulls back the curtain on the government's controversial plans to revamp the Law Society of British Columbia, including a reduction in elected lawyer positions, which may lead to increased government sway over legal affairs.

The BCNDP seems intent on ignoring a warning from the Supreme Court of Canada on the essential nature of an autonomous legal profession, particularly when the rights of individuals stand against government interests, and...

Discover the intricate dance of legality and medicine as we sit down with Barrister and Solicitor Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defense Lawyers, dissecting a lawsuit that could transform the landscape of healthcare in British Columbia. The Society for Canadians Studying Medicine Abroad, representing future doctors trained overseas, is challenging the residency placement system they believe is unfairly blocking their path. Through an engaging discussion, we navigate the complexities of a system that currently favours domestic medical graduates and the constitutional implications that come with such a divide. This episode promises not just an exploration of the legal battlefield but...

Understand the groundbreaking shift in digital privacy through an engaging conversation with Michael Mulligan of Mulligan Defence Lawyers as we dissect a recent Supreme Court of Canada judgment. The verdict is reshaping how we perceive privacy concerning our IP addresses, which, as it turns out, are windows into our personal lives and not just innocuous identifiers. Michael walks us through the complexities of a case that has set a new standard: law enforcement agencies must now secure a warrant before obtaining IP data. This discussion is a must-hear for anyone eager to grasp the profound implications for our constitutional...

Discover the thin line between lawful investigation and constitutional breaches with our expert Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defense Lawyers. We dissect a murder case where evidence handling sparked controversy and an acquittal that left many questioning the integrity of the investigation. Dive into a profound discussion on the procedural missteps during the seizure of cell phones and a security system, and how these actions swayed a trial's outcome. The legal dance between police conduct and individual rights is laid bare, offering a rare glimpse into the complex machinery of our criminal justice system.

Shifting gears, we tackle...

Have you ever grappled with the intricate workings of the legal system or wondered how an ordinary person can fare against its complexities? Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defense Lawyers joins us to unpack a gripping small claims court drama where a patient fearlessly faces a dentist over accusations of negligence. Walk through the courtroom doors in Abbotsford and witness the struggle of gathering admissible evidence, the nuances of consent in medical treatments, and the precarious balance between self-representation and the need for legal expertise. This episode peels back the layers of professional negligence, highlighting the importance of expert testimony...

Unlock the secrets of safeguarding your last wishes with a captivating narrative from Quadra Island, where an elderly lady's lost will sets off a legal firestorm over the presumption of destruction. As I narrate this tale of vanished legacies, you'll discover the critical importance of not only crafting a meticulous will but also ensuring its safekeeping. This episode plunges into the murky waters of estate law, unravelling a mystery that serves as a stark reminder: the absence of a will can unleash Pandora's box of legal quandaries.

Our discussion takes to the skies with the ongoing saga...

 From the sanctified grounds of religious buildings to the surprising sanctuaries for fruit trees and bomb shelters, we probe the public policy implications when specific properties are relieved from bearing the tax burden, leaving others to shoulder the financial weight. Our discussion navigates the murky waters of the Rural Area Taxation Act, shedding light on the ripple effect tax exemptions have on society.

Also on the show,  BC Hydro pulled the plug on a forestry company's cryptocurrency aspirations.

Finally, a sexual assault conviction is overturned as a result of Crown Counsel cross-examining the accused on wh...

Discover the far-reaching consequences of proposed changes to the Land Act in BC. With 94% of BC's land owned by the Crown, changes that would afford First Nations groups veto power over land use decisions could have a profound impact on how the province is governed. 

The provincial government's attempt to make the changes without a transparent consultation process, as well as the broader implications for democracy in the province, are discussed.

Also, on the show, the doctrine of frustration of contract is discussed in the context of a case involving a claim for severance pay b...

Unravel the complexities of Canadian law with barrister and solicitor Michael Mulligan, as he clarifies a major court decision on the government's use of the Emergencies Act during the 2022 trucker protest. Grasp the intricacies of why the court found this move both unreasonable and unconstitutional, and how it could signify a turning point for civil liberties in Canada. We're breaking down the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, potential overreach of government power, and the implications of free expression, all through the expert lens of our esteemed guest.

Transitioning to the tangible world of construction and liability, the...

This episode brings to the forefront the delicate balance between activism and legality, alongside the intricate nature of estate planning. The discussions offer invaluable insights for anyone interested in how the legal system addresses these often contentious issues.

We are also introduced to animal rights protesters who took drastic measures to expose what they believed were injustices within a pig farm. Barrister and Solicitor Michael Mulligan dissects the legal reasoning behind the protesters' defence, which drew parallels to a seemingly unrelated case in Ontario involving zoning laws and noise complaints. Mulligan brings to light the Court of...

Navigate the complexities of landlord-tenant relationships with the expertise of Barrister and Solicitor Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defense Lawyers, who joins us to unravel a contentious case where legal procedures and personal rights collide. As we dissect the Duncan case, you'll gain an understanding of how a simple notice for personal occupancy can escalate into a substantial monetary judgment and why procedural fairness in the Residential Tenancy Act hearings is more crucial than ever. Discover the role modern technology plays in judicial fairness as telephone hearings present unique challenges, including the risk of one party being left in the...

Dive into the heart of British Columbia's drug policy transformation with the sharp legal insight of Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defense Lawyers. Unravel the threads of the decriminalization initiative and the controversial exemption sparking debate from the streets to the courtroom. Amidst the policy shifts, we scrutinize the troubling uptick in public drug consumption and the persistent scourge of drug-related fatalities. The episode takes an incisive look at BC's Restricting Public Consumption of Illegal Substances Act and the challenging legal terrain it navigates, all through the lens of Mulligan's profound expertise.

Witness the tension between good intentions...

Navigating the intricate labyrinth of inheritance law, Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defense Lawyers illuminates the conflicts that can ensnare beneficiaries doubling as executors of wills. Our conversation scrutinizes the importance of meticulous estate planning and the often-overlooked wisdom of appointing an impartial executor. We dissect a compelling legal case that invokes Section 103 of the Wills, Estates, and Succession Act, unravelling its role in safeguarding an estate during contentious litigation. Tune in for an education on the delicate balance of respecting a deceased's wishes while upholding the letter of the law.

The waters of real estate transactions are...

When it comes to understanding the intricate legalities surrounding car accidents and insurance monopolies, there's no better guide than Michael Mulligan from Mulligan Defence Lawyers. In a revealing podcast episode, Mulligan elucidates murky financial arrangements at the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC), a Crown corporation with a grip on British Columbia's vehicle insurance.

The episode delves into a class action certification that shines a light on ICBC's financial transactions. Allegedly, ICBC made payments to the BC government for medical expenses that were not mandated, essentially imposing an unsanctioned tax on the ratepayers. This raises profound questions...